Support Refhub: Together for Knowledge and Culture

Dear friends,

As you know, Refhub.ir has always been a valuable resource for accessing free and legal books, striving to make knowledge and culture available to everyone. However, due to the current situation and the ongoing war between Iran and Israel, we are facing significant challenges in maintaining our infrastructure and services.

Unfortunately, with the onset of this conflict, our revenue streams have been severely impacted, and we can no longer cover the costs of servers, developers, and storage space. We need your support to continue our activities and develop a free and efficient AI-powered e-reader for you.

To overcome this crisis, we need to raise approximately $5,000. Every user can help us with a minimum of just $1. If we are unable to gather this amount within the next two months, we will be forced to shut down our servers permanently.

Your contributions can make a significant difference in helping us get through this difficult time and continue to serve you. Your support means the world to us, and every donation, big or small, can have a significant impact on our ability to continue our mission.

You can help us through the cryptocurrency payment gateway available on our website. Every step you take is a step towards expanding knowledge and culture.

Thank you so much for your support,

The Refhub Team

Donate Now

Euthanasia, Ethics and Public Policy: An Argument against Legalisation (Cambridge Bioethics and Law)

4.6

بر اساس نظر کاربران

شما میتونید سوالاتتون در باره کتاب رو از هوش مصنوعیش بعد از ورود بپرسید
هر دانلود یا پرسش از هوش مصنوعی 2 امتیاز لازم دارد، برای بدست آوردن امتیاز رایگان، به صفحه ی راهنمای امتیازات سر بزنید و یک سری کار ارزشمند انجام بدین

کتاب های مرتبط:

This book argues against the legalisation of voluntary euthanasia and/or physician-assisted suicide on the ground that, even if they were ethically defensible in certain 'hard cases', neither could be effectively controlled by law. It maintains that the experience of legalisation in the Netherlands, Belgium and Oregon lends support to the two 'slippery slope' arguments against legalisation, the 'empirical' and the 'logical'. The empirical argument challenges the feasibility of drafting and enforcing adequate safeguards against abuse and mistake; the logical argument shows that acceptance of the case for euthanasia in the case of suffering patients who request it logically involves acceptance of euthanasia for suffering patients who are unable to request it, such as infants and those with advanced dementia.

دانلود رایگان مستقیم

برای دانلود رایگان این کتاب و هزاران کتاب دیگه همین حالا عضو بشین

برای خواندن این کتاب باید نرم افزار PDF Reader را دانلود کنید Foxit Reader

نویسندگان:


نظرات:


4.6

بر اساس 0 نظر کاربران